this is an illustration of the "anomaly" discovered by the Ocean X team
[link] on the bottom of the Baltic sea.
read the story on their web-site or join the facebook group
[link] for more info.
check out this radio-interview with Peter Lindberg :
[link]from the Ocean X website :
"STOCKHOLM, Sweden, June 15, 2012
The Ocean X Team dove down to the circle-shaped object in the Baltic Sea and met something they never experienced before. First they thought it was just stone or a rock cliff, but after further observations the object appeared more as a huge mushroom, rising 3-4 meters/10-13 feet from the seabed, with rounded sides and rugged edges. The object had an egg shaped hole leading into it from the top, as an opening. On top of the object they also found strange stone circle formations, almost looking like small fireplaces. The stones were covered in something resembling soot.
“During my 20-year diving career, including 6000 dives, I have never seen anything like this. Normally stones don’t burn. I can’t explain what we saw, and I went down there to answer questions, but I came up with even more questions “, says Stefan Hogeborn, one of the divers at Ocean X Team.
The path to the object itself can be described as a runway or a downhill path that is flattened at the seabed with the object at the end of it.
“First we thought this was only stone, but this is something else. And since no volcanic activity has ever been reported in the Baltic Sea the find becomes even stranger. As laymen we can only speculate how this is made by nature, but this is the strangest thing I have ever experienced as a professional diver“, continues Peter Lindberg, one of the founder Ocean X Team.
"
here is a link to a 3d-movie about the thing i made together with my bro :
[link]stay tuned !

please credit me ( link to my gallery for example) if you use this image on your blog or website.
its NOT free for commercial use- and its not free to be transformed or modified in any way!
And, no exploration of the hole at the top? Either the divers saw and know more than they are revealing or there's nothing of value there.
By the way, did you know this was used in an English national newspaper running a story on the anomaly today (The Daily Mail)? Link to it is:
[link]
That's how I found your page.
regarding the rocksamples they are talking of in the article- these rocks where from around the anomaly and not actual pieces of the thing. the ocean x team was unable to break samples of the anomaly because its material is very hard- and the divers only carried little pickaxes with them. the rocksamples given to the swedish university where stones that where picked up around and from top of the anomaly- and yes some of them where most likely brought there by the ice-age.but the anomalies material itself was not analyzed yet.it is made of a different material- ocean x described it like very hard "concrete".
to say that the anomaly is an glaciar deposit because of the rocks found around it is like taking a sandstone from around the Giza pyramid and say its a natural formation. the baltic anomaly is probably older than the ice age. on top of the circle ocean x discovered small stone cicles-just like fireplaces... and this stones probably are glacial deposits- not the anomaly itself. just check out the latest blue-view sonar images released by Ocean X in the facebook group. too many 90º angles and straight lines combined with the perfect circular shape - and its huge size make it more and more unlikely that this is just an oddly formed stone.i very curious about Ocean x´s next expedition to the anomaly that starts in a few days. hopefully they will bring answers- but probably they also bring tons of new questions...